Tips in Mastering Audio at Home!
Mastering process is the last step in any music production process. It is highly recommended to master the tracks before it can be used for any commercial purposes. Why? What are the underlying reasons?:
1. Consumer audio player is different than yours, so it can sound different than what you will expect it to be. Any deviation in audio, will annoy normal or average listener.
2. In the play list of any consumer audio or mp3 players, 100% of those tracks are mastered, so if your song will be put on that list, it will sound very different and odd. Example is that, it will sound so “weak”, compared to other tracks.
3. No one will like to buy a CD or download a song online that will sound so weak and with low volume compared to what is “loud” for them. This is very distracting to listen (as any listener will turn up the volume of the player every time your track will be played, so funny.)
See image below for an example mastered wave:

Example of wave “NOT MASTERED”

Looking above, it is obvious; the mastered track will sound louder. But mastering is not making it loud, instead the primary aim to make “loud” and “beautiful”. Making it “beautiful” can be achieved by EQ and compression process.
Those are the above reasons you should master tracks. Before you can master tracks what are the requisites? Of course, you cannot master a track if it is not mixed “properly”, I emphasize this because a poorly mix track cannot be anymore saved in the mastering process, so in this case it should be re-mixed again. Mixing process is completely different than mastering process.
Requisites for a good mastering:
1. Properly Mixed track (no peaks above 0dB digital), you can call this a “clipped” track indicated by red indicator in your digital audio workstation. This is not allowed to be mastered as this will give horrible results!
2. Master at highest resolution possible! Do not master MP3 version. Mastering is all about adjusting audio in digital domain so you should master at the highest resolution possible. In my case, I use the 32 bit resolution at 44.1 kHz, (this is higher than CD quality).
3. Good monitors with subwoofer, flat as possible. If you are in budget and looking for quality/flat frequency response monitor for home studio, you can have M-Audio Studiophile AV 40 Powered Speakers
, this sounds great especially if you are using PC for mastering.
4. Good acoustics, know the response of your room acoustics very well.
Now for the actual show, how do you master the tracks???
1. Start with cleaning the tracks, you can remove noise, shortening gap in the beginning and ending. I recommend following CD audio red book standard for this.
2. EQ, add presence like +2dB in 2 kHz, +1dB in 1 KHz and +1dB in 4 kHz. Q is 1.
3. EQ part 2, remove mud sound, by cutting -3 dB in 200Hz (use Q of 1), -3dB (high pass filter action) at 35Hz.
4. EQ part 3, add bass and lower punch for more pop and rock sound (not applicable for jazz and country genre). If at mixing, kick is boosted at 100Hz, add +2dB in 100Hz, +2dB at 65Hz. Use Q of 1 for this.
5. Final EQ, add gloss and shiny sound, boost at 15kHz, Q =1.0, +2dB.
6. Apply low pass filter at 16500 Hz (this will pass everything below that , and severely attenuates above that mark). This is optional.
7. Compress, I use L2 Wave effects, compress so that the average RMS audio level is around -12dB for pop and rock volume average. The resulting wave should look like a mastered wave, such as shown above.
8. Save your work, and DO NOT DESTROY THE ORIGINAL MIX DOWN (unmastered track) from the mixing studio. Listen always. Use your EARS! This is the most precious studio equipment.
9. Finally criticize your work, open up your audio player, add commercial tracks similar to the genre you are mastering, and then add your mastered track…Does it sound different? Or sound competitively similar? Repeat the whole process if it fails the test. Use your ears to tweak those settings.
10.Save your work at 16bit 44.1kHz audio (CD audio quality) and use dithering.
Hope this helps a lot!
One of the best ways to learn audio mastering is listening t...
If you are doing self audio mastering at home for your own p...
A combination of “golden ear”, highly accurate nearfield mon...
You love the loudness and quality in mastering. After all it...

February 12th, 2009 at 1:10 am
Thanks for Sharing Your Knowledge. You may also like include a paragraph on parallel compression. acoosticzoo.com
April 12th, 2009 at 4:05 pm
Hi acoosticzoo, thanks for leaving a comment. I have heard a bit about parallel compression, maybe I can include this in the future.
Cheers.
May 4th, 2009 at 12:24 pm
Thanks for this tip that a lot of people do not do when selling their music. I read the above comment and have found this useful link for you on parallel compression that may help if you include a bit in your post.
http://www.hometracked.com/2007/03/31/parallel-compression-for-fatter-drum-tones/
May 9th, 2009 at 2:02 am
Hello Synthesizer Patches,
Your suggested link on parallel compression is fantastic. I will try to test it a lot in the studio.
Cheers
December 22nd, 2010 at 7:38 pm
This is a VERY interesting guide! I do apologizie for this question that could be sound very silly, but I did not understand one single point.
I usually burn my own music compilation on CD-r by ripping the tracks (Exact Audio Copy) from the original CD and/or decompressing MP3s all as Wave files/16 bit, then I put all the tracks at the same level by RMS method and burn.
All this processing is made working with Wave file/16 bits.
The question is: Should I convert all the Wave files form CD and the Mp3s at 32 bits, working on them (RMS) and, once I made it and immediatly before the burning, save the processing as Wave files/16 bits and burn it?
Sorry but I am a little bit confused….
January 7th, 2011 at 4:59 pm
Hi Francesco,
You find some information relating to your inquiry here: http://www.audiorecording.me/best-practices-for-audio-quality-cd-audio-wav-bit-depth-conversion.html
Cheers.
January 22nd, 2011 at 10:35 pm
These are great tips that all mastering and recording engineers should know.please include peak level compression
July 23rd, 2011 at 2:31 am
Interesting info on this site. Still scratching my head after 13 months of attempted audio mastering. Doing better now than a year ago. My biggest battle currently is getting my audio levels up to commercial standards. I’m not into the loudness wars as I keep hearing so much about on the net. But I am trying to produce music that can at least be heard when the stereo system, etc. is set on low volume levels. I’m beginning to think a large portion of this problem lies with my digital audio station software. No kidding. I get commercial audio volume levels when my song arrangements are playing through my DAW. After I mix down my song to an audio file that’s when the trouble begins. It’s like I lose 50 to 75% of audio volume after mix down. I don’t get it.
According to my peak/RMS meters. My audio volume bounced from around -8 to around -15 RMS on the song I was working on today. The peak levels generally stayed around -5 to -8. Maybe I’m cutting out too many peaks. I looked at a wave form from one of Boz Scaggs songs the other day. The RMS level usually fluctuated from around -15 to -20+ RMS and the peak levels bounced up to around -1. Even that song’s audio levels were louder than mine to date.
I don’t quite have the hang of using compression. But I have learned a few tricks lately that keeps my audio and master tracks from clipping and distorting. Equalizing isn’t really a problem for me either since I learned enough to eliminate the low end rumble and the unwanted piercing highs from high end frequency instruments. Long story short. If my DAW would mix down audio files at the same volume that it plays in my arrangements. 90% of my mastering troubles would be over.
September 28th, 2011 at 8:15 am
@Anne:
So many questions and possibilities. Hard to pin it down without knowing more of your setup.
Depending on the setup of your DAW, and how you have your music project setup, you could indeed see a difference in DB peaks. I’ve had that before with my setup.
It could be best to use Adobe Audition, or the like, to master your music. This way you’ll be able to see the actual wave and it’s peaks, etc. Software level meters aren’t 100% accurate, as they tend to be slower in response.
If you have a hardware mixer, you ca use that for level feedback, but you’ll have to make sure the trim levels etc are accurate; basically, making sure that your hardware mixer is showing an accurate DB level, which can take a little while to setup. To do this you’d have to play a constant tone from your software at a sustained DB level and match that DB level on your hardware mixer when it’s played back through it. Use a 0DB tone, make sure your slider (on the hardware mixer) is at 0DB, and then trim until the level meters show 0DB.
Hope you find a solution!
February 5th, 2012 at 2:16 am
I’m happy to see that you are dedicated enough to actually monitor your levels with the L2. I can’t stress how important this is with getting a quality master. One additional thing I think can help with the mastering process is being as objective as possible.
When you have mastered a mix, burn a copy of the song on a CD and take it to your car or some other place when you don’t normal mix. That way you won’t be distracted by the meters and you will be able to monitor more as a average listener and not a engineer.
Have a pen and paper ready and write down a “snag” list of how your mix compares to your reference track. Then revise your mix, comparing it to your master again. It may seem daunting how many changes you need to make in your initial master but this process over time will help you reach professional results faster than any other mixing process. Good job on the post!