<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Tips in Mastering Audio at Home!</title> <atom:link href="http://www.audiorecording.me/tips-in-mastering-audio-at-home.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.audiorecording.me/tips-in-mastering-audio-at-home.html</link> <description>Technical Guide in Computer Audio Recording</description> <lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 18:16:24 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: Dave</title><link>http://www.audiorecording.me/tips-in-mastering-audio-at-home.html/comment-page-4#comment-13140</link> <dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 18:16:24 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wordpress/tips-in-mastering-audio-at-home/#comment-13140</guid> <description>I&#039;m happy to see that you are dedicated enough to actually monitor your levels with the L2. I can&#039;t stress how important this is with getting a quality master. One additional thing I think can help with the mastering process is being as objective as possible.
When you have mastered a mix, burn a copy of the song on a CD and take it to your car or some other place when you don&#039;t normal mix. That way you won&#039;t be distracted by the meters and you will be able to monitor more as a average listener and not a engineer.
Have a pen and paper ready and write down a &quot;snag&quot; list of how your mix compares to your reference track. Then revise your mix, comparing it to your master again. It may seem daunting how many changes you need to make in your initial master but this process over time will help you reach professional results faster than any other mixing process. Good  job on the post!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m happy to see that you are dedicated enough to actually monitor your levels with the L2. I can&#8217;t stress how important this is with getting a quality master. One additional thing I think can help with the mastering process is being as objective as possible.</p><p>When you have mastered a mix, burn a copy of the song on a CD and take it to your car or some other place when you don&#8217;t normal mix. That way you won&#8217;t be distracted by the meters and you will be able to monitor more as a average listener and not a engineer.</p><p>Have a pen and paper ready and write down a &#8220;snag&#8221; list of how your mix compares to your reference track. Then revise your mix, comparing it to your master again. It may seem daunting how many changes you need to make in your initial master but this process over time will help you reach professional results faster than any other mixing process. Good  job on the post!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Aaron</title><link>http://www.audiorecording.me/tips-in-mastering-audio-at-home.html/comment-page-3#comment-9762</link> <dc:creator>Aaron</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2011 00:15:59 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wordpress/tips-in-mastering-audio-at-home/#comment-9762</guid> <description>@Anne:
So many questions and possibilities. Hard to pin it down without knowing more of your setup.
Depending on the setup of your DAW, and how you have your music project setup, you could indeed see a difference in DB peaks. I&#039;ve had that before with my setup.
It could be best to use Adobe Audition, or the like, to master your music. This way you&#039;ll be able to see the actual wave and it&#039;s peaks, etc. Software level meters aren&#039;t 100% accurate, as they tend to be slower in response.
If you have a hardware mixer, you ca use that for level feedback, but you&#039;ll have to make sure the trim levels etc are accurate; basically, making sure that your hardware mixer is showing an accurate DB level, which can take a little while to setup. To do this you&#039;d have to play a constant tone from your software at a sustained DB level and match that DB level on your hardware mixer when it&#039;s played back through it. Use a 0DB tone, make sure your slider (on the hardware mixer) is at 0DB, and then trim until the level meters show 0DB. ;)
Hope you find a solution!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Anne:</p><p>So many questions and possibilities. Hard to pin it down without knowing more of your setup.</p><p>Depending on the setup of your DAW, and how you have your music project setup, you could indeed see a difference in DB peaks. I&#8217;ve had that before with my setup.</p><p>It could be best to use Adobe Audition, or the like, to master your music. This way you&#8217;ll be able to see the actual wave and it&#8217;s peaks, etc. Software level meters aren&#8217;t 100% accurate, as they tend to be slower in response.</p><p>If you have a hardware mixer, you ca use that for level feedback, but you&#8217;ll have to make sure the trim levels etc are accurate; basically, making sure that your hardware mixer is showing an accurate DB level, which can take a little while to setup. To do this you&#8217;d have to play a constant tone from your software at a sustained DB level and match that DB level on your hardware mixer when it&#8217;s played back through it. Use a 0DB tone, make sure your slider (on the hardware mixer) is at 0DB, and then trim until the level meters show 0DB. <img
src='http://www.audiorecording.me/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /></p><p>Hope you find a solution!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Anne</title><link>http://www.audiorecording.me/tips-in-mastering-audio-at-home.html/comment-page-3#comment-8975</link> <dc:creator>Anne</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 22 Jul 2011 18:31:20 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wordpress/tips-in-mastering-audio-at-home/#comment-8975</guid> <description>Interesting info on this site. Still scratching my head after 13 months of attempted audio mastering. Doing better now than a year ago. My biggest battle currently is getting my audio levels up to commercial standards. I&#039;m not into the loudness wars as I keep hearing so much about on the net. But I am trying to produce music that can at least be heard when the stereo system, etc. is set on low volume levels. I&#039;m beginning to think a large portion of this problem lies with my digital audio station software. No kidding. I get commercial audio volume levels when my song arrangements are playing through my DAW. After I mix down my song to an audio file that&#039;s when the trouble begins. It&#039;s like I lose 50 to 75% of audio volume after mix down. I don&#039;t get it.
According to my peak/RMS meters. My audio volume bounced from around -8 to around -15 RMS on the song I was working on today. The peak levels generally stayed around -5 to -8. Maybe I&#039;m cutting out too many peaks. I looked at a wave form from one of Boz Scaggs songs the other day. The RMS level usually fluctuated from around -15 to -20+ RMS and the peak levels bounced up to around -1. Even that song&#039;s audio levels were louder than mine to date.
I don&#039;t quite have the hang of using compression. But I have learned a few tricks lately that keeps my audio and master tracks from clipping and distorting. Equalizing isn&#039;t really a problem for me either since I learned enough to eliminate the low end rumble and the unwanted piercing highs from high end frequency instruments. Long story short. If my DAW would mix down audio files at the same volume that it plays in my arrangements. 90% of my mastering troubles would be over.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting info on this site. Still scratching my head after 13 months of attempted audio mastering. Doing better now than a year ago. My biggest battle currently is getting my audio levels up to commercial standards. I&#8217;m not into the loudness wars as I keep hearing so much about on the net. But I am trying to produce music that can at least be heard when the stereo system, etc. is set on low volume levels. I&#8217;m beginning to think a large portion of this problem lies with my digital audio station software. No kidding. I get commercial audio volume levels when my song arrangements are playing through my DAW. After I mix down my song to an audio file that&#8217;s when the trouble begins. It&#8217;s like I lose 50 to 75% of audio volume after mix down. I don&#8217;t get it.</p><p>According to my peak/RMS meters. My audio volume bounced from around -8 to around -15 RMS on the song I was working on today. The peak levels generally stayed around -5 to -8. Maybe I&#8217;m cutting out too many peaks. I looked at a wave form from one of Boz Scaggs songs the other day. The RMS level usually fluctuated from around -15 to -20+ RMS and the peak levels bounced up to around -1. Even that song&#8217;s audio levels were louder than mine to date.</p><p>I don&#8217;t quite have the hang of using compression. But I have learned a few tricks lately that keeps my audio and master tracks from clipping and distorting. Equalizing isn&#8217;t really a problem for me either since I learned enough to eliminate the low end rumble and the unwanted piercing highs from high end frequency instruments. Long story short. If my DAW would mix down audio files at the same volume that it plays in my arrangements. 90% of my mastering troubles would be over.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Rorey Baker</title><link>http://www.audiorecording.me/tips-in-mastering-audio-at-home.html/comment-page-3#comment-6314</link> <dc:creator>Rorey Baker</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 22 Jan 2011 14:35:36 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wordpress/tips-in-mastering-audio-at-home/#comment-6314</guid> <description>These are great tips that all mastering and recording engineers should know.please include peak level compression</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>These are great tips that all mastering and recording engineers should know.please include peak level compression</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Emerson Maningo</title><link>http://www.audiorecording.me/tips-in-mastering-audio-at-home.html/comment-page-2#comment-5880</link> <dc:creator>Emerson Maningo</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 07 Jan 2011 08:59:08 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wordpress/tips-in-mastering-audio-at-home/#comment-5880</guid> <description>Hi Francesco,
You find some information relating to your inquiry here: http://www.audiorecording.me/best-practices-for-audio-quality-cd-audio-wav-bit-depth-conversion.html
Cheers.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Francesco,<br
/> You find some information relating to your inquiry here: <a
href="http://www.audiorecording.me/best-practices-for-audio-quality-cd-audio-wav-bit-depth-conversion.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.audiorecording.me/best-practices-for-audio-quality-cd-audio-wav-bit-depth-conversion.html</a></p><p>Cheers.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
